I have never read before that I may expect a response within 60 business days. This is from a unit of the United States Government which “is committed to responding to your message in a timely manner”.

In Modernity and the Holocaust, Zygmunt Bauman argues that for all the incontestable novelty of the Nazi genocide against the Jews, its essential message lies in what it tells us about modernity and its peculiar mindset, rationality and institutions, thus about something general, to be found in other places and nations, within other political movements and therefore facilitating that something like it will happen again.

—Arne Johan Vetlesen, “Reassessing Modernity and the Holocaust in the light of genocide in Bosnia”,  in Revisiting Modernity and the Holocaust, eds. Jack Palmer and Dariusz Brzeziński, (London: Routledge, 2022), 111.

Wolfgang Streeck, Jacobin:

Noch grundsätzlicher ließe sich fragen, was ein Staat seinen Bürgern, die auf seinen Befehl hin ihr Leben lassen sollen, an Bemühungen schuldet, den Krieg, dem sie zum Opfer fallen könnten, gar nicht erst stattfinden zu lassen. Hier könnten gegenseitige Pflichten von Staaten aus dem Völkerrecht ins Spiel kommen, die man auch, zumal in Demokratien, als Pflichten gegenüber ihren Bürgern lesen könnte. Kann ein Staat einen moralischen Anspruch darauf erheben, dass von ihm ausgewählte Bürger auf seinen Befehl hin bereit sind zu sterben oder sich lebenslang verstümmeln zu lassen, wenn er nicht vorher alles getan hat, um ihnen dies zu ersparen? Zu denken wäre hier beispielsweise an Artikel 33 (1) der Charta der Vereinten Nationen:

Ω Ω Ω

In Deutschland könnte für die Frage der Legitimität einer Wehrpflicht des Weiteren auch der Umstand ins Gewicht fallen, dass es wohl kaum ein anderes Land gibt, in dem so wenig an strategischer Diskussion über nationale Interessen und nationale Sicherheit stattfindet wie hier. Seit dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs ist das deutsche Militär und sind die deutschen »Verteidigungspolitiker« nicht deutsch, sondern atlantisch orientiert, mit gelegentlichen gaullistischen Ausbruchsversuchen, die aber immer frühzeitig beendet wurden.

This morning I felt like I was reading something in a sort of a fantasyland. The idea that this German state, busily producing weapons for the Israelis to use in massacring Palestinian civilians, is going to consider its duty to German citizens because of some obligation under international law, because of the Charter of the United Nations? It just reads as unreal, a voice from a previous era.

Streeck rings true, of course. I look for, and fail to find, public debate of German national interests, just as I used to try to engage German coworkers in any sort of discussion. Topics such as Israel and Ukraine are quite clearly beyond question. I’ve been impressed several times when I simply tried to raise the idea of talking about the background to the Russian invasion, or the causes for the Palestinian break-out from Gaza, and gotten the very explicit response that these points were not up for discussion.

Peter Hitchens, The Spectator:

the era’s greatest reporter of US government secrets, from the My Lai massacre to the Abu Ghraib prison disgrace, Seymour Hersh, has lengthily and credibly explained how the US did indeed plant and detonate the enormous bombs needed. But it’s no use. It’s too tedious and ordinary.

I, for one, am certainly exercising increased caution today, as the security environment remains complex with the potential for unforeseen escalation. Foreseen escalation I’m o.k. with, but it’s this potential for unforeseen escalation which concerns me. 😬

Rima Hassan, +972 Magazine:

I met with the president of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola, who confirmed that no member of the European Parliament had ever previously been placed in police custody over a tweet.

…

They geolocated me and monitored my movements for three months. They mobilized [the French national railway operator] SNCF, Air France, and Europol to trace all my activities. It was completely disproportionate and abusive. It resembles the procedures of a police state. All of this over a tweet.

…

Figures on the French right and far right have called for you to be stripped of your French citizenship. What does that reveal about the particular place Palestine occupies in French politics?

The way I think about it is that Palestine is a test for Western democracies. It produces Kafkaesque situations, in which states proclaim their commitment to the rule of law and moral standards, only to find themselves in complete moral and political failure when confronted with the genocide in Gaza. [Faced with that contradiction], they go so far as to turn against their own citizens and elected representatives in order to preserve their political, material, economic, geostrategic, or even ideological support for Israel.

One of the first albums I ever bought. Liked it a lot. Going to have to say when I was eleven “Come rub it upon my belly like guava jelly” didn’t have the same meaning it would ten years later.

Guardian:

Trump appears to be flirting with electoral disaster in re-stoking a war that is already unpopular with voters – not least for its inflationary impact on fuel and living costs.

“There’s basically no timeline in which this makes any sense for preserving [Republicans’] midterm performance,” said Curt Mills, executive editor of the American Conservative, a magazine promoting isolationist foreign policy goals favored by Trump’s “American first” supporters.

“I think it’s a total loser. It’s evidence that Trump doesn’t really care about the midterms. He’s like Icarus with the sun with this stuff – it seems to be a personal vendetta with the Iranians.”

The Guardian uses phrases like “flirting with electoral disaster” and “personal vendetta” to describe the United States bombing Iranian schools, bridges, and water treatment plants.